narrower traces

i'd like to lay out a trace that will fit between a couple of pads with .100 mil spacing.  the minimum wire size in fritzing won't quite fit.  i was wondering if i could get away with opening the sketch in a text editor and changed all occurences of "wireExtras mils=24" to "wireExtras mils=8."

Posted 2 years, 6 months ago by mtbf0

ok, tried it.  looks like fritzing is displaying 8 mil traces, but with 24 mil blobs at all the bends in the trace.  must experiment further...

Posted 2 years, 6 months ago by mtbf0

The thinnest trace that's currently supported is 16mil.  It looks like you've already used the  popup labeled "width" available in the inspector to set the trace width, but at least if you set your wires to 16 mil, then the blobs might be that size instead of 24 after you hand-edit the sketch. 

I'm not an expert at this, but if distances are too fine, you may get some unexpected electrical behavior.  Also you will have to be sure that whoever prints the board can handle that level of accuracy.

- j

Posted 2 years, 6 months ago by Jonathan Cohen

i take it the circles are to cover any discontinuities or wierd jaggies where the traces bend.  since the size survived my doctoring the file, somewhere in the xml there must be a memory of the trace width other than within the wireExtras tag.  any suggestions?

Posted 2 years, 6 months ago by mtbf0

The "blob" is generated without reference to the wire width--it is just the bendpoint handle.  It will not appear in gerber export.  If the handle (but not the rest of the trace) touches another part or trace, there is no actual electrical connection made.

- j

Posted 2 years, 6 months ago by Jonathan Cohen

sorry.  had i not been falling asleep i could have generated a set of gerbers and resolved that one for myself.  thanks for your patience.

Posted 2 years, 6 months ago by mtbf0

Post a Reply

Please login to post a reply.

  • RSS
  • Atom
  • Print this
© 2007 - 2011 University of Applied Sciences Potsdam